<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772594</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal remanded the tax appeal back to the CIT(A) for fresh hearing due to procedural errors. The key issues involved unexplained cash deposits and property investments under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. Despite the assessee&#039;s non-compliance, the Tribunal emphasized the need for natural justice, directing a de novo review with an opportunity for the assessee to present evidence. A cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 16:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772594</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal remanded the tax appeal back to the CIT(A) for fresh hearing due to procedural errors. The key issues involved unexplained cash deposits and property investments under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act. Despite the assessee&#039;s non-compliance, the Tribunal emphasized the need for natural justice, directing a de novo review with an opportunity for the assessee to present evidence. A cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>