https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772602 ITAT Ahmedabad remanded the case back to CIT(A) regarding addition of 15% on capital grants in subsidy and consumer contribution transferred to profit and loss account versus 5.28% offered by assessee as income from other sources. The CIT(A) had not adequately discussed whether the bifurcation of return of income related to the difference in income from other sources. ITAT directed CIT(A) to adjudicate this issue afresh following principles of natural justice and providing opportunity of hearing to the assessee. en-us Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772602 ITAT Ahmedabad remanded the case back to CIT(A) regarding addition of 15% on capital grants in subsidy and consumer contribution transferred to profit and loss account versus 5.28% offered by assessee as income from other sources. The CIT(A) had not adequately discussed whether the bifurcation of return of income related to the difference in income from other sources. ITAT directed CIT(A) to adjudicate this issue afresh following principles of natural justice and providing opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772602