<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 720 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772607</link>
    <description>The SC examined the validity of reopening an income tax assessment under section 147 beyond four years without obtaining prior approval from the PCIT/CIT as mandated by section 151(1). The Court found the reopening invalid due to lack of competent authority&#039;s approval, thereby quashing the assessment order. The appeal was allowed, establishing that strict procedural compliance is essential for reassessments initiated after the four-year period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 720 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772607</link>
      <description>The SC examined the validity of reopening an income tax assessment under section 147 beyond four years without obtaining prior approval from the PCIT/CIT as mandated by section 151(1). The Court found the reopening invalid due to lack of competent authority&#039;s approval, thereby quashing the assessment order. The appeal was allowed, establishing that strict procedural compliance is essential for reassessments initiated after the four-year period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>