<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 737 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772624</link>
    <description>In this GST case, the HC found the detention and confiscation of stock transfer goods invalid. The court held that the e-way bill generated before the detention order, coupled with evidence of stock transfer nature, negated tax evasion claims. The authorities failed to follow procedural safeguards, rendering the detention, penalty, and appeal dismissal unlawful. The impugned orders were quashed, and any deposited amounts were to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 18:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 737 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772624</link>
      <description>In this GST case, the HC found the detention and confiscation of stock transfer goods invalid. The court held that the e-way bill generated before the detention order, coupled with evidence of stock transfer nature, negated tax evasion claims. The authorities failed to follow procedural safeguards, rendering the detention, penalty, and appeal dismissal unlawful. The impugned orders were quashed, and any deposited amounts were to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>