https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772625 Delhi HC set aside demand orders where SCN was uploaded on 'Additional Notices Tab' without proper notice to petitioner. Court found petitioner did not receive adequate opportunity to be heard as SCN dated 29th September 2023 was not brought to petitioner's notice. Following precedent in Neelgiri Machinery case, HC remanded matter to adjudicating authority directing petitioner to file reply within thirty days and requiring department to email hearing notices rather than merely uploading on portal. en-us Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772625 Delhi HC set aside demand orders where SCN was uploaded on 'Additional Notices Tab' without proper notice to petitioner. Court found petitioner did not receive adequate opportunity to be heard as SCN dated 29th September 2023 was not brought to petitioner's notice. Following precedent in Neelgiri Machinery case, HC remanded matter to adjudicating authority directing petitioner to file reply within thirty days and requiring department to email hearing notices rather than merely uploading on portal. Case-Laws GST Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772625