<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 744 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631</link>
    <description>GST adjudication was challenged as without jurisdiction because the original show cause notice proposed only IGST, while a subsequent notice issued after the asserted limitation period introduced enhanced CGST and SGST demands. The final demand allegedly dropped the IGST proposal but imposed CGST and SGST liabilities beyond the scope of the original notice. The jurisdictional and limitation objections required consideration, and interim protection stayed the operation of the adjudication order pending further listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 744 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631</link>
      <description>GST adjudication was challenged as without jurisdiction because the original show cause notice proposed only IGST, while a subsequent notice issued after the asserted limitation period introduced enhanced CGST and SGST demands. The final demand allegedly dropped the IGST proposal but imposed CGST and SGST liabilities beyond the scope of the original notice. The jurisdictional and limitation objections required consideration, and interim protection stayed the operation of the adjudication order pending further listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>