https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631 The article concerns a challenge to an adjudication order on jurisdictional grounds, where the petitioner argued that a later show cause notice was issued after limitation and that the final demand exceeded the scope of the original notice. The original notice reportedly proposed only IGST, while the later notice introduced enhanced CGST and SGST demands. It was also contended that the impugned order dropped the IGST demand but imposed substantial CGST and SGST liability beyond the notice. The High Court directed a counter affidavit and granted interim protection by staying the operation of the adjudication order until the next date. en-us Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631 The article concerns a challenge to an adjudication order on jurisdictional grounds, where the petitioner argued that a later show cause notice was issued after limitation and that the final demand exceeded the scope of the original notice. The original notice reportedly proposed only IGST, while the later notice introduced enhanced CGST and SGST demands. It was also contended that the impugned order dropped the IGST demand but imposed substantial CGST and SGST liability beyond the notice. The High Court directed a counter affidavit and granted interim protection by staying the operation of the adjudication order until the next date. Case-Laws GST Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772631