<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 745 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772632</link>
    <description>The HC upheld GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns, but provided a remedial pathway. The court directed the petitioner can seek restoration within two months by submitting all pending returns and paying full tax dues with interest. The proper officer must expeditiously consider the restoration application, balancing statutory compliance with procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 745 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772632</link>
      <description>The HC upheld GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns, but provided a remedial pathway. The court directed the petitioner can seek restoration within two months by submitting all pending returns and paying full tax dues with interest. The proper officer must expeditiously consider the restoration application, balancing statutory compliance with procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>