<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44290</link>
    <description>A saving clause in an export-control order preserved only pre-existing, approved export rights and did not create a new entitlement to export unapproved goods; export of non-basmati rice therefore remained subject to the regulatory regime and related licensing conditions. The licensing authority could validly impose a minimum export price and registration-cum-allocation requirement for such exports. An amended industrial licence could also require export of edible rice bran oil, and domestic clearances by a 100% export oriented unit attracted excise duty and interest under the statute, notwithstanding interim orders. The unit was also held liable for the price differential on rice exported under conditional relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44290</link>
      <description>A saving clause in an export-control order preserved only pre-existing, approved export rights and did not create a new entitlement to export unapproved goods; export of non-basmati rice therefore remained subject to the regulatory regime and related licensing conditions. The licensing authority could validly impose a minimum export price and registration-cum-allocation requirement for such exports. An amended industrial licence could also require export of edible rice bran oil, and domestic clearances by a 100% export oriented unit attracted excise duty and interest under the statute, notwithstanding interim orders. The unit was also held liable for the price differential on rice exported under conditional relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>