<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1730 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462313</link>
    <description>Legal representatives under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act may maintain a death claim even without full dependency, because dependency affects quantification, not maintainability; major married earning sons were therefore not confined to conventional heads. Family pension received by the deceased was not part of her income for loss-of-dependency computation, so it was excluded. Financial assistance under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependants of Deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 was deductible only to the extent of the specific pay-and-allowances component actually receivable, to prevent double recovery; a blanket partial deduction was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1730 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462313</link>
      <description>Legal representatives under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act may maintain a death claim even without full dependency, because dependency affects quantification, not maintainability; major married earning sons were therefore not confined to conventional heads. Family pension received by the deceased was not part of her income for loss-of-dependency computation, so it was excluded. Financial assistance under the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependants of Deceased Government Employees Rules, 2006 was deductible only to the extent of the specific pay-and-allowances component actually receivable, to prevent double recovery; a blanket partial deduction was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>