<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462325</link>
    <description>HC ruled on capital gains taxation in property sale. Court held that full sale consideration (Rs. 4,00,00,000/-) must be used for computing capital gains, not just the amount physically received. The agency agreement between seller and agent does not alter tax liability. The HC quashed the revision order and directed reassessment, mandating comprehensive examination of deduction claims under Section 48 of Income Tax Act within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1559 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462325</link>
      <description>HC ruled on capital gains taxation in property sale. Court held that full sale consideration (Rs. 4,00,00,000/-) must be used for computing capital gains, not just the amount physically received. The agency agreement between seller and agent does not alter tax liability. The HC quashed the revision order and directed reassessment, mandating comprehensive examination of deduction claims under Section 48 of Income Tax Act within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>