<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 135 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44282</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee by the Tribunal but directed that no prosecution should be initiated against the assessee to resolve the difference of opinion. Civil Appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 135 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44282</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee by the Tribunal but directed that no prosecution should be initiated against the assessee to resolve the difference of opinion. Civil Appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>