<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 114 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44279</link>
    <description>The SC disposed of the appeals by granting the Revenue liberty to move the Tribunal for reconsideration of the limitation issue in light of Rule 173(J) of the Central Excise Rules. If such an application is filed, it must not be rejected as time-barred, preserving the Revenue&#039;s opportunity to have the limitation question re-examined on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 114 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44279</link>
      <description>The SC disposed of the appeals by granting the Revenue liberty to move the Tribunal for reconsideration of the limitation issue in light of Rule 173(J) of the Central Excise Rules. If such an application is filed, it must not be rejected as time-barred, preserving the Revenue&#039;s opportunity to have the limitation question re-examined on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>