https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89266 ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute concerning salary income earned in the United Kingdom. The tribunal rejected the assessee's first contention challenging the CPC's intimation under section 143(1)(a), noting that automated processing does not invalidate adjustments. The tribunal found no merit in the procedural challenge and directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to conduct a de novo adjudication. The case was restored for comprehensive reassessment, mandating proper opportunity for the assessee to present details regarding salary income, tax deduction at source, and related issues. Grounds 2-4 were allowed for statistical purposes, with explicit instructions to prevent unnecessary procedural delays. en-us Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:14 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89266 ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute concerning salary income earned in the United Kingdom. The tribunal rejected the assessee's first contention challenging the CPC's intimation under section 143(1)(a), noting that automated processing does not invalidate adjustments. The tribunal found no merit in the procedural challenge and directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to conduct a de novo adjudication. The case was restored for comprehensive reassessment, mandating proper opportunity for the assessee to present details regarding salary income, tax deduction at source, and related issues. Grounds 2-4 were allowed for statistical purposes, with explicit instructions to prevent unnecessary procedural delays. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:14 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89266