<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Seized Diaries Reveal Tax Adjustments: Income Recalculated with Precise Profit Percentages Across Trading Domains</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89261</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled on multiple grounds related to assessment reopening and income determination based on seized diaries. The Tribunal upheld the assessment order with key modifications: (1) land trading profit to be computed at 13.14% instead of 15%, (2) share trading profit to be calculated at 8%, (3) Maalkhaate trading income to be estimated at 10%, and (4) allowing telescoping of income already taxed in preceding years with peak additions. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s objections regarding jurisdiction, reopening validity, and seized document interpretation while directing the Assessing Officer to recompute certain income components based on specific guidelines provided in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Seized Diaries Reveal Tax Adjustments: Income Recalculated with Precise Profit Percentages Across Trading Domains</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89261</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled on multiple grounds related to assessment reopening and income determination based on seized diaries. The Tribunal upheld the assessment order with key modifications: (1) land trading profit to be computed at 13.14% instead of 15%, (2) share trading profit to be calculated at 8%, (3) Maalkhaate trading income to be estimated at 10%, and (4) allowing telescoping of income already taxed in preceding years with peak additions. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s objections regarding jurisdiction, reopening validity, and seized document interpretation while directing the Assessing Officer to recompute certain income components based on specific guidelines provided in the order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>