<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 594 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772481</link>
    <description>The SC held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued beyond the normal one-year limitation period was invalid, as the appellant was registered, regularly filed returns, and paid service tax transparently. The Tribunal found no suppression or fraud, thus rejecting the extended limitation period. The admitted short payment of Rs. 4,19,734/- was adjusted against amounts already paid, and no penalty was imposed due to the appellant&#039;s compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 594 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772481</link>
      <description>The SC held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued beyond the normal one-year limitation period was invalid, as the appellant was registered, regularly filed returns, and paid service tax transparently. The Tribunal found no suppression or fraud, thus rejecting the extended limitation period. The admitted short payment of Rs. 4,19,734/- was adjusted against amounts already paid, and no penalty was imposed due to the appellant&#039;s compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>