https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772493 A leave and licence occupant could not avoid licence fee by relying on unauthorised correspondence or an alleged set-off for approval and fit-out expenses; the contractual obligation to pay after the fit-out period continued. The adjudicating authority was competent to direct surrender of possession where the premises remained the corporate debtor's property and the dispute affected preservation of insolvency estate value. The moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not protect a third-party licensee from contractual default consequences, and action taken by the resolution professional with committee approval was not impermissible on the facts stated. The appeal was held to lack merit and the eviction and dues directions were left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772493 A leave and licence occupant could not avoid licence fee by relying on unauthorised correspondence or an alleged set-off for approval and fit-out expenses; the contractual obligation to pay after the fit-out period continued. The adjudicating authority was competent to direct surrender of possession where the premises remained the corporate debtor's property and the dispute affected preservation of insolvency estate value. The moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not protect a third-party licensee from contractual default consequences, and action taken by the resolution professional with committee approval was not impermissible on the facts stated. The appeal was held to lack merit and the eviction and dues directions were left undisturbed. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 28 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772493