<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 622 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772509</link>
    <description>ITAT Lucknow dismissed the assessee bank&#039;s appeal against demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for failure to deduct TDS on LFC reimbursements for employees&#039; foreign travel. The tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s plea of bonafide belief that TDS was not required cannot constitute reasonable cause under section 273B. Being a leading corporate entity with adequate intellectual resources, the assessee should have exercised due diligence. The tribunal confirmed CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding the TDS demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 622 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772509</link>
      <description>ITAT Lucknow dismissed the assessee bank&#039;s appeal against demand under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) for failure to deduct TDS on LFC reimbursements for employees&#039; foreign travel. The tribunal held that the assessee&#039;s plea of bonafide belief that TDS was not required cannot constitute reasonable cause under section 273B. Being a leading corporate entity with adequate intellectual resources, the assessee should have exercised due diligence. The tribunal confirmed CIT(A)&#039;s order upholding the TDS demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>