<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 631 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772518</link>
    <description>The IT Tribunal condoned a 279-day delay in appeal filing and remanded an ex-parte income tax assessment order. The case involved an unexplained payment of Rs. 50,50,000 for property purchase. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence from the Assessing Officer to justify the addition and directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing the need for specific details and opportunity to be heard before passing adverse orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:10:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 631 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772518</link>
      <description>The IT Tribunal condoned a 279-day delay in appeal filing and remanded an ex-parte income tax assessment order. The case involved an unexplained payment of Rs. 50,50,000 for property purchase. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence from the Assessing Officer to justify the addition and directed a fresh hearing, emphasizing the need for specific details and opportunity to be heard before passing adverse orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>