<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 632 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772519</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). AO denied exemption claiming mandatory filing of return u/s 139(4C)(e) was required. ITAT held no such mandate exists in the statutory provisions and that filing return u/s 139(4C)(e) is not a mandatory condition for claiming exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). The tribunal ruled assessee eligible for exemption, deleted the addition, and found AO and CIT(A) incorrect in disallowing the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:59:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 632 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772519</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed assessee&#039;s appeal regarding exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). AO denied exemption claiming mandatory filing of return u/s 139(4C)(e) was required. ITAT held no such mandate exists in the statutory provisions and that filing return u/s 139(4C)(e) is not a mandatory condition for claiming exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab). The tribunal ruled assessee eligible for exemption, deleted the addition, and found AO and CIT(A) incorrect in disallowing the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>