<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 661 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772548</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC is premised on the accused being in custody or having surrendered. Where interim bail granted under the pandemic concession had been withdrawn and the applicants did not surrender, they remained outside custody, so the regular bail applications could not be examined on merits and were not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 661 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772548</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC is premised on the accused being in custody or having surrendered. Where interim bail granted under the pandemic concession had been withdrawn and the applicants did not surrender, they remained outside custody, so the regular bail applications could not be examined on merits and were not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>