<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 664 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772551</link>
    <description>An adjudication order passed under Section 74 was unsustainable where the mandatory opportunity of personal hearing under Section 75(4) was not afforded before an adverse determination. The absence of hearing was undisputed, and non-compliance with the statutory requirement vitiated the order. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond and be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:43:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 664 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772551</link>
      <description>An adjudication order passed under Section 74 was unsustainable where the mandatory opportunity of personal hearing under Section 75(4) was not afforded before an adverse determination. The absence of hearing was undisputed, and non-compliance with the statutory requirement vitiated the order. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond and be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>