https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44255 Non-declaration of imported silver, use of the Green Channel, and concealment were treated as misdeclaration supporting confiscation under customs law. The import notification relied upon did not displace the established treatment of concealed or undeclared goods, so the claimed benefit could not defeat absolute confiscation on these facts. In writ jurisdiction, the factual finding of concealment was not shown to be illegal or improper, and the challenge to the order restoring absolute confiscation therefore failed. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:52:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44255 Non-declaration of imported silver, use of the Green Channel, and concealment were treated as misdeclaration supporting confiscation under customs law. The import notification relied upon did not displace the established treatment of concealed or undeclared goods, so the claimed benefit could not defeat absolute confiscation on these facts. In writ jurisdiction, the factual finding of concealment was not shown to be illegal or improper, and the challenge to the order restoring absolute confiscation therefore failed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44255