<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44254</link>
    <description>The Writ Appeal focused on the classification of products under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, specifically betel nut powder, and the eligibility for a refund of excise duty. The court vacated the single Judge&#039;s opinion that passing on of excise duty to consumers would bar a refund, directing the second Appellate Authority to decide the matter based on settled law and pending reference for guidance. The judgment underscored the importance of clarity on legal principles in determining refund eligibility, emphasizing consistency and adherence to established legal precedents in excise duty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44254</link>
      <description>The Writ Appeal focused on the classification of products under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, specifically betel nut powder, and the eligibility for a refund of excise duty. The court vacated the single Judge&#039;s opinion that passing on of excise duty to consumers would bar a refund, directing the second Appellate Authority to decide the matter based on settled law and pending reference for guidance. The judgment underscored the importance of clarity on legal principles in determining refund eligibility, emphasizing consistency and adherence to established legal precedents in excise duty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>