<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44253</link>
    <description>A second writ petition on the same grievance was ordinarily not maintainable where an earlier judicial direction required the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s documents and pass a speaking order. However, continued non-compliance with that earlier order justified enforcement of the prior direction in the later proceeding. The court therefore gave limited relief by making the earlier direction operative, while reiterating that repeated writ recourse is not the proper remedy for the same complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:49:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44253</link>
      <description>A second writ petition on the same grievance was ordinarily not maintainable where an earlier judicial direction required the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s documents and pass a speaking order. However, continued non-compliance with that earlier order justified enforcement of the prior direction in the later proceeding. The court therefore gave limited relief by making the earlier direction operative, while reiterating that repeated writ recourse is not the proper remedy for the same complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>