https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89222 AT allowed the appeal against parallel proceedings involving the former MD and CEO of ICICI Bank. The tribunal found potential procedural bias due to the same adjudicating officer handling investigations against both the bank and the appellant. The fundamental principles of fair practice were violated, as the officer was privy to documents from ICICI Bank that could potentially influence the appellant's case. The tribunal directed SEBI to provide the appellant with copies of show cause notices, allow inspection of all bank-related documents, and schedule a fresh hearing, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair defense. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:45 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89222 AT allowed the appeal against parallel proceedings involving the former MD and CEO of ICICI Bank. The tribunal found potential procedural bias due to the same adjudicating officer handling investigations against both the bank and the appellant. The fundamental principles of fair practice were violated, as the officer was privy to documents from ICICI Bank that could potentially influence the appellant's case. The tribunal directed SEBI to provide the appellant with copies of show cause notices, allow inspection of all bank-related documents, and schedule a fresh hearing, ensuring the appellant's right to a fair defense. Highlights SEBI Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:45 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89222