<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 526 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772413</link>
    <description>The HP HC dismissed a revision petition in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the NI Act. The accused admitted issuing the cheque but claimed it was given as security for a loan. The court held that once execution was admitted, presumption under Sections 118 and 139 arose, which the accused failed to rebut by not appearing as witness or examining witnesses. The accused&#039;s application for additional evidence was rejected as documents were available before trial closure. The court upheld conviction and compensation of Rs.52,932/- on cheque amount of Rs.7,47,068/-, considering six-year delay and litigation expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 526 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772413</link>
      <description>The HP HC dismissed a revision petition in a dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 of the NI Act. The accused admitted issuing the cheque but claimed it was given as security for a loan. The court held that once execution was admitted, presumption under Sections 118 and 139 arose, which the accused failed to rebut by not appearing as witness or examining witnesses. The accused&#039;s application for additional evidence was rejected as documents were available before trial closure. The court upheld conviction and compensation of Rs.52,932/- on cheque amount of Rs.7,47,068/-, considering six-year delay and litigation expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>