https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772416 The SC held that an employer's closure application was deemed approved under Section 25-O(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Deputy Secretary's letter requiring resubmission with better particulars was not a valid order as it lacked authority from the appropriate Government and showed non-application of mind by the competent authority. Since no proper order was communicated within 60 days of the application, deemed closure took effect. The HC erred in relying on incorrect statutory forms. Appeal allowed. en-us Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772416 The SC held that an employer's closure application was deemed approved under Section 25-O(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Deputy Secretary's letter requiring resubmission with better particulars was not a valid order as it lacked authority from the appropriate Government and showed non-application of mind by the competent authority. Since no proper order was communicated within 60 days of the application, deemed closure took effect. The HC erred in relying on incorrect statutory forms. Appeal allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772416