https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772417 CESTAT Mumbai allowed an appeal by a cement company regarding CENVAT credit for Goods Transport Agency services. Relying on a Larger Bench decision in Ramco Cements Ltd, the Tribunal found the first appellate authority's denial incorrect. The ruling clarified that CENVAT credit eligibility depends on the place of removal under FOR contract basis, following Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original order denying tax credit. en-us Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772417 CESTAT Mumbai allowed an appeal by a cement company regarding CENVAT credit for Goods Transport Agency services. Relying on a Larger Bench decision in Ramco Cements Ltd, the Tribunal found the first appellate authority's denial incorrect. The ruling clarified that CENVAT credit eligibility depends on the place of removal under FOR contract basis, following Supreme Court and High Court precedents. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original order denying tax credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 15 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772417