<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 532 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772419</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism for two key issues: payments for foreign trainers&#039; travel expenses and IT support services. The Tribunal ruled that travel expenses are not taxable service value and IT support services do not qualify as OIDAR services. Consequently, the tax demands for 2008-2010 were set aside, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions and upholding the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 532 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772419</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal addressed service tax liability under Reverse Charge Mechanism for two key issues: payments for foreign trainers&#039; travel expenses and IT support services. The Tribunal ruled that travel expenses are not taxable service value and IT support services do not qualify as OIDAR services. Consequently, the tax demands for 2008-2010 were set aside, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions and upholding the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>