<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772425</link>
    <description>HC analyzed jurisdiction under FEMA 1999 regarding appeal limitation periods. The court held that limitation period commences from formal order communication, not website upload. Since appellants were not officially notified, their appeals filed within 120 days were deemed timely. HC allowed delay condonation for Bank of Baroda and Doha Bank, while confirming IDBI&#039;s appeal was within prescribed timeframe. No costs were imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 538 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772425</link>
      <description>HC analyzed jurisdiction under FEMA 1999 regarding appeal limitation periods. The court held that limitation period commences from formal order communication, not website upload. Since appellants were not officially notified, their appeals filed within 120 days were deemed timely. HC allowed delay condonation for Bank of Baroda and Doha Bank, while confirming IDBI&#039;s appeal was within prescribed timeframe. No costs were imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>