https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772428 Access to material used in parallel adjudication proceedings was held essential to a fair defence where the same factual matrix and a common adjudicating officer were involved. The refusal to inspect and obtain the co-noticee's replies, submissions, annexures, exhibits and data was treated as prima facie unfair because relevant material that may be relied on against a noticee must be disclosed, and withholding it can also raise a risk of bias. The appellant was therefore entitled to inspect the available records and take notes, and the authority was required to furnish the specified documents and fix a fresh hearing date. en-us Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Jun 2025 10:05:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772428 Access to material used in parallel adjudication proceedings was held essential to a fair defence where the same factual matrix and a common adjudicating officer were involved. The refusal to inspect and obtain the co-noticee's replies, submissions, annexures, exhibits and data was treated as prima facie unfair because relevant material that may be relied on against a noticee must be disclosed, and withholding it can also raise a risk of bias. The appellant was therefore entitled to inspect the available records and take notes, and the authority was required to furnish the specified documents and fix a fresh hearing date. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772428