<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772430</link>
    <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed appeals challenging penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 for smuggling ozone depleting refrigerant gas (HCFC-22). The tribunal upheld penalties based on forensic evidence from seized phone, call detail records, and a preplanned meeting at McDonald&#039;s restaurant where four parties conspired to clear restricted goods. The court applied preponderance of probability standard rather than beyond reasonable doubt for customs evasion cases. Despite appellants&#039; denials and challenges to voice sample procedures, the tribunal found clear nexus establishing their active participation in the smuggling conspiracy, confirming confiscation of goods and proportionate penalties were justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 543 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772430</link>
      <description>CESTAT New Delhi dismissed appeals challenging penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962 for smuggling ozone depleting refrigerant gas (HCFC-22). The tribunal upheld penalties based on forensic evidence from seized phone, call detail records, and a preplanned meeting at McDonald&#039;s restaurant where four parties conspired to clear restricted goods. The court applied preponderance of probability standard rather than beyond reasonable doubt for customs evasion cases. Despite appellants&#039; denials and challenges to voice sample procedures, the tribunal found clear nexus establishing their active participation in the smuggling conspiracy, confirming confiscation of goods and proportionate penalties were justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>