https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772449 ITAT Mumbai dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding TDS liability u/s 195 on payments to foreign entity for transponder charges. CIT(A) correctly held that payments to Intelsat Global Sales and Marketing Limited did not constitute royalty under s.9(1)(vi) or relevant DTAA, following Delhi HC precedent in Intelsat Corporation case and coordinate bench decisions in assessee's own case. No contrary authority or stay orders were presented by Revenue to challenge established precedent that such payments are not liable for TDS. en-us Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772449 ITAT Mumbai dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding TDS liability u/s 195 on payments to foreign entity for transponder charges. CIT(A) correctly held that payments to Intelsat Global Sales and Marketing Limited did not constitute royalty under s.9(1)(vi) or relevant DTAA, following Delhi HC precedent in Intelsat Corporation case and coordinate bench decisions in assessee's own case. No contrary authority or stay orders were presented by Revenue to challenge established precedent that such payments are not liable for TDS. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772449