<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772463</link>
    <description>The Madras HC held that an assessee-promoter who pledged shares of one company to secure a loan for a sister company and subsequently wrote off the resulting loss as bad debt was entitled to claim deduction. The court found that pledging shares to enable a group company to obtain financing constituted business activity, and the loss was incurred for business expediency. Following the Mahindra and Mahindra precedent, the court ruled that once an assessee records an amount as business loss in books of account, it establishes prima facie that the loss was not recoverable, with the burden on the Assessing Officer to prove otherwise with cogent reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:29:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 576 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772463</link>
      <description>The Madras HC held that an assessee-promoter who pledged shares of one company to secure a loan for a sister company and subsequently wrote off the resulting loss as bad debt was entitled to claim deduction. The court found that pledging shares to enable a group company to obtain financing constituted business activity, and the loss was incurred for business expediency. Following the Mahindra and Mahindra precedent, the court ruled that once an assessee records an amount as business loss in books of account, it establishes prima facie that the loss was not recoverable, with the burden on the Assessing Officer to prove otherwise with cogent reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>