https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44235 Pending adjudication of an alleged misdeclaration of engine capacity, the Court considered release of the vehicle appropriate in the interest of justice because the clearance order had already been passed on payment of duty. Interim release was granted subject to safeguards protecting the Department's interests, including an undertaking to produce the vehicle when required, a promise not to alienate it without clearance, an inventory of spare parts, and a personal bond for the differential duty amount. The merits of the misdeclaration allegation were left open for future adjudication. en-us Tue, 20 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:15:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44235 Pending adjudication of an alleged misdeclaration of engine capacity, the Court considered release of the vehicle appropriate in the interest of justice because the clearance order had already been passed on payment of duty. Interim release was granted subject to safeguards protecting the Department's interests, including an undertaking to produce the vehicle when required, a promise not to alienate it without clearance, an inventory of spare parts, and a personal bond for the differential duty amount. The merits of the misdeclaration allegation were left open for future adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44235