<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1677 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462279</link>
    <description>In a case alleging large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds through private institutions, the HC balanced the seriousness of the socio-economic offence against Article 21 liberty and settled bail principles. It found that investigation relating to the petitioner&#039;s institutions was complete, the charge-sheet had been filed, the petitioner had joined investigation, and no further police remand was sought. As the record did not support apprehensions of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, the Court held that continued custodial detention was unnecessary and granted regular bail subject to stringent conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1677 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462279</link>
      <description>In a case alleging large-scale misappropriation of scholarship funds through private institutions, the HC balanced the seriousness of the socio-economic offence against Article 21 liberty and settled bail principles. It found that investigation relating to the petitioner&#039;s institutions was complete, the charge-sheet had been filed, the petitioner had joined investigation, and no further police remand was sought. As the record did not support apprehensions of absconding, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses, the Court held that continued custodial detention was unnecessary and granted regular bail subject to stringent conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>