<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 1580 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462290</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur held that reopening assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to jurisdictional defect. The assessing officer who issued notice u/s 148 differed from the officer who framed the assessment, without any transfer order u/s 127. Following precedent in Sarita Jain case, the Tribunal found the assessment order was passed without proper jurisdictional authority. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed based on this procedural violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 22:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 1580 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462290</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur held that reopening assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to jurisdictional defect. The assessing officer who issued notice u/s 148 differed from the officer who framed the assessment, without any transfer order u/s 127. Following precedent in Sarita Jain case, the Tribunal found the assessment order was passed without proper jurisdictional authority. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed based on this procedural violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>