<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772324</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that High Carbon Ferro Manganese lumps cleared by appellant for captive consumption to sister unit should be valued under Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000, not Rule 4. Following precedent in National Aluminium Company Ltd. case, tribunal found appellant correctly paid duty per CBEC Circular No.692/8/2003-CX dated 13.02.2003. Impugned order lacked merit and was set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 437 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772324</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that High Carbon Ferro Manganese lumps cleared by appellant for captive consumption to sister unit should be valued under Rule 8 of Valuation Rules, 2000, not Rule 4. Following precedent in National Aluminium Company Ltd. case, tribunal found appellant correctly paid duty per CBEC Circular No.692/8/2003-CX dated 13.02.2003. Impugned order lacked merit and was set aside. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>