<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772336</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal analyzed the nature of services provided by the Appellant, determining they constituted maintenance and repair services rather than manpower supply services. The court found the tax demand invalid, as it was based solely on Income Tax Returns and Form 26AS without evidence of suppression. Consequently, the demand was held barred by limitation, and the Appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772336</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal analyzed the nature of services provided by the Appellant, determining they constituted maintenance and repair services rather than manpower supply services. The court found the tax demand invalid, as it was based solely on Income Tax Returns and Form 26AS without evidence of suppression. Consequently, the demand was held barred by limitation, and the Appellant was granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>