<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772339</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal ruled in favor of a co-operative security agency, holding it qualifies as an &quot;association of persons&quot; under Notification No. 30/2012-ST. The agency was entitled to 75% tax abatement, having paid 25% of service tax liability. The court rejected allegations of tax evasion, set aside the demand, interest, and penalty, and found the extended limitation period improperly invoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 452 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772339</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal ruled in favor of a co-operative security agency, holding it qualifies as an &quot;association of persons&quot; under Notification No. 30/2012-ST. The agency was entitled to 75% tax abatement, having paid 25% of service tax liability. The court rejected allegations of tax evasion, set aside the demand, interest, and penalty, and found the extended limitation period improperly invoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>