<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772344</link>
    <description>CASE SUMMARY:The Tribunal addressed a service tax dispute involving Rent-a-Cab services. The HC partially upheld the tax demand, reducing it to Rs. 5,13,223/-. While denying full abatement due to lack of evidence regarding Cenvat Credit non-availment, the Tribunal dropped penalties, recognizing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief about tax liability. The extended limitation period was validated, and the service tax demand with interest was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 457 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772344</link>
      <description>CASE SUMMARY:The Tribunal addressed a service tax dispute involving Rent-a-Cab services. The HC partially upheld the tax demand, reducing it to Rs. 5,13,223/-. While denying full abatement due to lack of evidence regarding Cenvat Credit non-availment, the Tribunal dropped penalties, recognizing the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief about tax liability. The extended limitation period was validated, and the service tax demand with interest was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>