<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 467 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772354</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI held that assessment orders under section 153A were invalid due to improper approval granted under section 153D. The tribunal found that CIT(A) wrongly upheld the assessment order following a search conducted at assessee&#039;s premises. The approval was deemed merely technical and symbolic, making the assessment orders legally defective. Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed as being bad in law, with other grounds left open for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:57:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 467 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772354</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI held that assessment orders under section 153A were invalid due to improper approval granted under section 153D. The tribunal found that CIT(A) wrongly upheld the assessment order following a search conducted at assessee&#039;s premises. The approval was deemed merely technical and symbolic, making the assessment orders legally defective. Consequently, the assessment orders were quashed as being bad in law, with other grounds left open for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>