<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 468 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772355</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld the validity of notice issued under section 153C, reversing CIT(A)&#039;s order that quashed the assessment. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s satisfaction note adequate where documents found during search belonged to the assessee, noting both the searched person and assessee had the same AO. CIT(A) erred in finding the satisfaction improper without considering binding SC precedents in Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Super Malls cases. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 468 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772355</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad upheld the validity of notice issued under section 153C, reversing CIT(A)&#039;s order that quashed the assessment. The tribunal found the AO&#039;s satisfaction note adequate where documents found during search belonged to the assessee, noting both the searched person and assessee had the same AO. CIT(A) erred in finding the satisfaction improper without considering binding SC precedents in Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Super Malls cases. Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>