<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772361</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore condoned a 149-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause without malafide intention. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, citing precedents where delays of 21 years and 600+ days were condoned. However, regarding the Section 80G(5) approval rejection, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable since the assessee trust had voluntarily withdrawn its application before the CIT (Exemptions), creating no cause of action for appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 474 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772361</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore condoned a 149-day delay in filing appeal, finding sufficient cause without malafide intention. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, citing precedents where delays of 21 years and 600+ days were condoned. However, regarding the Section 80G(5) approval rejection, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable since the assessee trust had voluntarily withdrawn its application before the CIT (Exemptions), creating no cause of action for appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>