<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44215</link>
    <description>The court resolved the dispute over the classification of goods under Heading 54.02 or Heading 56.06 in favor of the petitioner. However, despite the petitioner&#039;s plea to avoid payment of duty under the accepted heading due to financial concerns, the court found no valid reason to grant a stay. The court dismissed the stay petition and lifted the interim stay, allowing for the enforcement of duty under Heading 54.02 as per the appellate order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:47:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 82 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44215</link>
      <description>The court resolved the dispute over the classification of goods under Heading 54.02 or Heading 56.06 in favor of the petitioner. However, despite the petitioner&#039;s plea to avoid payment of duty under the accepted heading due to financial concerns, the court found no valid reason to grant a stay. The court dismissed the stay petition and lifted the interim stay, allowing for the enforcement of duty under Heading 54.02 as per the appellate order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>