https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772395 A petition challenged continuation of State tax proceedings concerning the same period and alleged wrongful or excess input tax credit after Central tax action had already been initiated and concluded, invoking the bar under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and the relevant circular. The State Tax Authorities sought time to place their response on record, and further consideration of the challenge was deferred. Meanwhile, the impugned State order remained stayed until further orders, an affidavit in reply was called for, and time to carry out amendment was extended. en-us Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772395 A petition challenged continuation of State tax proceedings concerning the same period and alleged wrongful or excess input tax credit after Central tax action had already been initiated and concluded, invoking the bar under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and the relevant circular. The State Tax Authorities sought time to place their response on record, and further consideration of the challenge was deferred. Meanwhile, the impugned State order remained stayed until further orders, an affidavit in reply was called for, and time to carry out amendment was extended. Case-Laws GST Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772395