<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 509 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772396</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained. The Bombay High Court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Greatship (India) Limited to hold that the petitioner must first pursue the available appellate remedy and then, if necessary, approach the Court or other appropriate forum. On that basis, the petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 509 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772396</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, a writ petition will ordinarily not be entertained. The Bombay High Court relied on the Supreme Court decision in Greatship (India) Limited to hold that the petitioner must first pursue the available appellate remedy and then, if necessary, approach the Court or other appropriate forum. On that basis, the petition was dismissed for want of maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>