<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44212</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 393/86-C.E. applied to barrier creams falling under sub-heading 3304.00 only when manufactured under and in accordance with a licence issued under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The product was treated as a barrier cream because it was classified under Heading 3304, described by the appellant in its own materials and licence application as a barrier cream, and licensed as &quot;Oil of Olay (Barrier Cream)&quot;. The Court found that the label and product description matched the accepted description of a barrier cream, and that the addition of beauty-cream characteristics did not take it outside the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 107 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44212</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 393/86-C.E. applied to barrier creams falling under sub-heading 3304.00 only when manufactured under and in accordance with a licence issued under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. The product was treated as a barrier cream because it was classified under Heading 3304, described by the appellant in its own materials and licence application as a barrier cream, and licensed as &quot;Oil of Olay (Barrier Cream)&quot;. The Court found that the label and product description matched the accepted description of a barrier cream, and that the addition of beauty-cream characteristics did not take it outside the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>