https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772400 Delhi HC dismissed writ petition challenging order based on fraudulent ITC availment allegations. Court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised in cases involving fraudulent ITC claims due to burden on exchequer and impact on GST regime, following precedent in Mukesh Kumar Garg case. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act by July 15, 2025, with required pre-deposit. Appeal, if filed within timeframe, shall be decided on merits without limitation objection. Petition disposed of. en-us Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772400 Delhi HC dismissed writ petition challenging order based on fraudulent ITC availment allegations. Court held that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised in cases involving fraudulent ITC claims due to burden on exchequer and impact on GST regime, following precedent in Mukesh Kumar Garg case. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal under Section 107 of CGST Act by July 15, 2025, with required pre-deposit. Appeal, if filed within timeframe, shall be decided on merits without limitation objection. Petition disposed of. Case-Laws GST Tue, 20 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772400