https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772401 Delhi HC declined to entertain writ petition challenging show cause notice for fraudulent ITC availment. Court held that despite petitioner's claim of non-receipt of SCN and hearing notice, adequate notice was provided. HC emphasized that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised in fraudulent ITC cases considering burden on exchequer and impact on GST regime. Petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedy under Section 107 CGST Act, 2017 with mandatory pre-deposit by July 15, 2025, with assurance that appeal would be decided on merits without limitation bar. Petition disposed of. en-us Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772401 Delhi HC declined to entertain writ petition challenging show cause notice for fraudulent ITC availment. Court held that despite petitioner's claim of non-receipt of SCN and hearing notice, adequate notice was provided. HC emphasized that writ jurisdiction should not be exercised in fraudulent ITC cases considering burden on exchequer and impact on GST regime. Petitioner was directed to pursue appellate remedy under Section 107 CGST Act, 2017 with mandatory pre-deposit by July 15, 2025, with assurance that appeal would be decided on merits without limitation bar. Petition disposed of. Case-Laws GST Tue, 27 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772401